Rent the H100 if…
you train or fine-tune transformers at scale, serve models in FP8 with vLLM or TensorRT-LLM, or need 8-GPU NVLink nodes for jobs that last weeks — time saved is money saved.
Deploy an H100 · $1,249/moQuestions? Open a ticket from your console — an engineer replies within one business day.
Same 80 GB of memory, two generations apart. The H100 SXM brings FP8, 1.6× the memory bandwidth and about 3× the dense tensor throughput; the A100 80 GB costs about half as much per month.
The short answer
For training, and for any model that can use FP8, rent the H100: its tensor cores do about three times the dense FP16 work of the A100 and add an FP8 path the A100 does not have, so a compute-bound job finishes well before the price difference catches up. The A100 remains the better buy when the job is bound by memory capacity rather than compute — LoRA and QLoRA fine-tunes, 16-bit inference of models up to about 35B parameters, computer vision, speech — because it offers the same 80 GB for $649 a month instead of $1,249.
you train or fine-tune transformers at scale, serve models in FP8 with vLLM or TensorRT-LLM, or need 8-GPU NVLink nodes for jobs that last weeks — time saved is money saved.
Deploy an H100 · $1,249/moyour workload runs in BF16, FP16 or TF32 and is limited by the 80 GB rather than by compute — QLoRA, LoRA, vision, speech, embeddings — or you want MIG to split one GPU into isolated instances.
Deploy an A100 · $649/moSpecifications
NVIDIA's published figures for each part, tensor throughput without sparsity. The last column is how the H100 compares, as a multiple of the A100.
| Specification | NVIDIA H100 SXM | NVIDIA A100 | H100 vs A100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Hopper · 2022 | Ampere · 2020 | — |
| GPU memory | 80 GB HBM3 | 80 GB HBM2e | Same |
| Memory bandwidth | 3.35 TB/s | 2 TB/s | 1.6× |
| FP16 / BF16 tensor (dense) | ~989 TFLOPS | 312 TFLOPS | 3.2× |
| FP8 tensor (dense) | ~1,979 TFLOPS | Not supported | Only the H100 |
| FP4 tensor (dense) | Not supported | Not supported | — |
| Maximum power | Up to 700 W | 400 W | 1.8× |
| Form factor | SXM5 | SXM4 | — |
| GPU-to-GPU link | NVLink 4 · 900 GB/s | NVLink 3 · 600 GB/s | — |
| Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) | Up to 7 instances | Up to 7 instances | — |
| ECC memory | Yes | Yes | — |
| Video engines | 7 NVDEC · 7 NVJPG | 5 NVDEC · no NVENC | — |
| CUDA compute capability | 9.0 | 8.0 | — |
| Dedicated host here | 24 vCPU · 256 GB RAM · 3 TB NVMe | 16 vCPU · 128 GB RAM · 2 TB NVMe | — |
| Price per month here | $1,249 | $649 | 1.9× |
Sources: NVIDIA datasheets and product pages for each GPU. Tensor figures are dense (NVIDIA often prints them doubled “with sparsity”). Prices are this site's flat monthly rates for a dedicated server with the host listed, in USD excluding VAT.
Value
Price per month divided into the two resources most jobs run out of first — memory and memory bandwidth — and what the same GPU costs kept on for a month at the market-median hourly rate.
Model sizes
The largest model whose weights fit on a single GPU, keeping 10% of the memory for the runtime, activations and a small KV cache. Long contexts and large batches need more — size them with the GPU memory calculator.
| Weights precision | NVIDIA H100 SXM | NVIDIA A100 | Typical use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16-bit (BF16 / FP16) | up to ~36B parameters | up to ~36B parameters | Full-precision inference; the base weights of a LoRA fine-tune |
| 8-bit (FP8 / INT8) | up to ~72B parameters | up to ~72B parameters | FP8 serving with vLLM or TensorRT-LLM on GPUs that support it; INT8 weights elsewhere |
| 4-bit (GPTQ, AWQ, Q4) | up to ~130B parameters | up to ~130B parameters | Quantised inference on a budget; QLoRA fine-tuning |
Parameters in billions, weights only: 2 bytes per parameter at 16-bit, 1 at FP8 or INT8, about 0.55 at 4-bit (GPTQ, AWQ, GGUF Q4). Mixture-of-experts models need memory for all their experts, not just the active ones.
Prices
Per dedicated GPU server, in USD excluding VAT — CPU cores, RAM, NVMe, 20 TB of transfer and 24/7 support included.
| Term | NVIDIA H100 SXM | NVIDIA A100 | Difference per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly | $1,249 | $649 | $600 |
| 3 months · −5% | $1,187 | $617 | $570 |
| 6 months · −10% | $1,124 | $584 | $540 |
| 12 months · −15% | $1,062 | $552 | $510 |
| Dedicated host | 24 vCPU · 256 GB RAM · 3 TB NVMe · 25 Gbps | 16 vCPU · 128 GB RAM · 2 TB NVMe · 25 Gbps | included |
On paper it has 3.2× the dense FP16 tensor throughput and adds FP8, so compute-bound transformer training sees the largest gains. Memory-bound work gains closer to the 1.6× bandwidth difference, and jobs limited by data loading or communication gain less. Benchmark your own model: the monthly price difference here is 1.9×.
Both have 80 GB, so the same models fit. The difference is speed: 3.35 TB/s of HBM3 on the H100 SXM against 2 TB/s of HBM2e on the A100 80 GB.
For FP8 serving and high-throughput batches, the H100: FP8 halves the memory taken by the weights and its bandwidth raises tokens per second. For 16-bit inference of a model that fits comfortably, the A100 serves it for about half the monthly price.
14 of 64 H100 units were free at the last stock update; 21 of 48 A100 units were free at the last stock update (18 September 2026). Both are provisioned automatically, in under 10 minutes after payment.
Yes. Both are rented with an email address and paid from a prepaid balance in Bitcoin, Ether or USDT — $1,249 and $649 a month, dedicated, with no identity check and no card.
Dedicated, single-tenant and live in under 10 minutes: the H100 at $1,249 or the A100 at $649 a month, paid in BTC, ETH or USDT with no KYC.